<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Spammers Use Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.structuredthought.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=83" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.structuredthought.org/?p=83</link>
	<description>Annoyed with stupidity since 1975</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:28:43 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark  Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.structuredthought.org/?p=83&#038;cpage=1#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark  Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 18:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.structuredthought.org/?p=86#comment-52</guid>
		<description>For the longest time, I&#039;ve been trying to figure out why so many SEO people have followed me on Twitter. Now, I know!

Thanks, Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the longest time, I&#8217;ve been trying to figure out why so many SEO people have followed me on Twitter. Now, I know!</p>
<p>Thanks, Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nandrews</title>
		<link>http://www.structuredthought.org/?p=83&#038;cpage=1#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>nandrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 14:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.structuredthought.org/?p=86#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Yeah. nofollow would be a solution, but it&#039;s one of those things where we would have to change the way something works to stop someone from abusing it. It should be the other way around. We need to find a way to stop people from abusing the crawlers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah. nofollow would be a solution, but it&#8217;s one of those things where we would have to change the way something works to stop someone from abusing it. It should be the other way around. We need to find a way to stop people from abusing the crawlers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.structuredthought.org/?p=83&#038;cpage=1#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 05:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.structuredthought.org/?p=86#comment-50</guid>
		<description>Interesting. I&#039;d never thought about it that way.

It has such a simple solution, too: add &#039;rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&#039; to the &quot;followers&quot; and &quot;following&quot; links.

Sure, it&#039;ll limit human beings who are following thousands of people... but if they&#039;re really that popular, people are going to be linking to them in other ways anyway. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. I&#8217;d never thought about it that way.</p>
<p>It has such a simple solution, too: add &#8216;rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221;&#8216; to the &#8220;followers&#8221; and &#8220;following&#8221; links.</p>
<p>Sure, it&#8217;ll limit human beings who are following thousands of people&#8230; but if they&#8217;re really that popular, people are going to be linking to them in other ways anyway. <img src='http://www.structuredthought.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
